唐教授难道是用金山快译来写英文摘要？
<REC>
<KEYWORDS>=全球化;民族国家;马克思;世界历史
<DEGREE_NAME>=哲学博士
<DISCIPLINE>=哲学
<TU2_NAME>=
<TI_CN>=全球化时代民族国家问题的哲学思考
<AB_CN>= 论文从哲学视角，以唯物史观，特别是马克思的“世界历史”思想和普遍交往理论为指导，对全球化现象和“民族国家悖论”进行了探索和思考。
全球化是民族国家悖论发生的实践基础和现实背景。因此，论文首先从马克思的“世界历史”思想出发，对全球化本质内涵和基本特征进行了界定。
“民族国家悖论”是论文着力探讨的中心议题。论文认为，全球化迄今为止的进程中所呈现的不平等和不平衡特征是“悖论”产生的实践基础；“西方中心论”基础上的极端全球主义和极端民族主义的形而上学思维方式及其二元对立是“悖论”产生的理论根源；“民族国家过时论”是“悖论”的理论表现 。
论文追溯了民族国家范畴的历史建构过程，在充分肯定西方民族主义古典理论及其关于民族国家的“一族一国”古典模式在世界历史的现代性转型过程中所发挥的巨大积极作用的同时，深刻批判了其西方中心论特征、形而上学思维方式和历史化约论方法。揭示了民族国家古典形式在全球化时代的现实性和普遍性缺失，并从新全球视角上对民族国家范畴的本质内涵进行了探索和重建，并在此基础上揭示了民族国家范畴现代形式的现实性和普遍性。
论文揭示了民族国家在全球化时代面临的现实困境和理论挑战。在此基础上，论文分别对极端全球主义者所倡导的“世界新秩序”、“主权过时论”和极端民族主义所追求的民族主义时代进行了分析和批判，并揭示了它们各自的利益基础和阶级本质。最后，论文试图阐明：在可以预见的将来，民族国家仍然将是世界政治秩序的基本构成单元，主权国家仍将是世界社会最为重要的行动主体。主权独立和平等原则，仍将是构建未来世界秩序的基础。民族主义浪潮在冷战后的爆发，尽管在方式和后果上具有强烈的非理性色彩，但却有着内在的历史合理性，民族主义在一定时期内仍将存在，理性、积极和融合性的民族主义不但是建构未来多元世界秩序的重要合法性资源，而且也是民族主义未来发展的总的趋势；不过，这并不意味一个民族主义时代的到来。论文同时指出，全球化时代，民族国家也面临着严峻的改革压力，体制创新和职能改革将是其可能的理性选择之一。

<TI_EN>=A philosophical perspective on the paradox of the nation-state in the global times
<LATEST_DATE>=2002.06
<TU1_NAME>=赵家祥
<AU_MAJOR>=马克思主义哲学
<TU3_NAME>=
<FULLTEXT_URL>=2002/19923814.pdf
<AU>=唐昆雄
<AB_EN>=In the circumstance of globalization, the nation-state is now facing double challenges both in theory and practice: On one hand, the hyperglobalizers predict the demise of the nation-state on the face of globalization occur, alongside an awareness of the growth of transnational political institutions and norms. New images of world order speak of the emergence of the global citizen and a global civil society, stimulated once again by the corrosive effective effect of migration and global communications on nationalism and parochialism. On the other hand, various hypernationalizers refuse to recognize the national state they are from nowadays. They question its legality and want to go back to a world in which one ethnic group is an independent state to protect their political, economic benefit and their national culture value. It is the paradox of the nation-state.
This dissertation explores the phenomenon of globalization and “the paradox of nation-state” from historical materialism, especially Marx’s thought of world history and his theory of universal communications.
The paradox of nation-state is the central topic of this dissertation. This dissertation thinks that the inequity and unbalance in the process of globalization is the practical base on which this paradox is formed.
This dissertation traces back to the historical process of the category of nation-state. It affirms the active influence of the classical theory of western nationalism and criticizes the western-centered feature of this kind of theory.
This dissertation exposes the theoretical challenge and practical dilemma which nation-state is facing in the times of globalization. It argues that globalization is an umbrella term for a number of processes, political and cultural as well as economic, involving in different aspects of social changes and loading in a variety of directions.
This dissertation predicts that nation-state will not be out-state in the future that we can imagine, though it need a radical reform in the way it works .

<AU_DEPT>=哲学系、宗教学系