送交者: Latino2 于 2007-11-13, 15:26:02:

回答: 中國最早巫山人 與東非人同歲 ZT 由 4U4luC2 于 2007-11-13, 14:53:09:

• 为什么不做个DNA (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 15:56:16 (182608)
  • 太久了, however, 化石的差别已经够明显了 (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:02:29 (182615)
    • DNA tests probably are to give some idea about how old they are (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:09:08 (182625)
      • The fossil is too old to get DNA. Radiocarbon can do the job too. (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:19:49 (182634)
        • at least 10 years ago, you can read some papers - Wood (504 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:31:33 (182641)
          • 那个很近, 只有几万年， 还有骨头。 直人只有化石。 (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:46:56 (182650)
            • DNA was extracted from 80-million-year-old bone - Wood (715 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:56:22 (182656)
              • Those results are not reproducible. You don't see people publish such paper - Latino2 (132 bytes) 2007-11-13, 17:06:41 (182660)
      • 估计拉兄说的是DNA已经无法取样 (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:18:20 (182633)
        • Correct. (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:20:28 (182635)
          • not really (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2007-11-13, 16:47:12 (182651)

加跟贴