There is no such thing as 免于突然被机关枪扫射的权利

送交者: qm 于 2015-12-08, 17:35:25:

回答: 米国的问题是过分保护拥枪者的权利而忽视无枪者的权利由 LB 于 2015-12-08, 16:26:17:

免于突然被机关枪扫射的权利? If anyone did that to you, he or she will be punished. That all you can have. You already have that right.

You have no right to have the society to guarantee you 免于突然被机关枪扫射. Just as you have no right to have anyone to guarantee you not subject to any crime.

My guns will not harm you unless you try to harm me. Tell me why my guns violate any one of your rights?

I know I don't have that "right" so I arm myself.

所有跟贴:

I consider that part of 'Freedom from fear'. (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2015-12-08, 17:57:13 (795764)
- 为了你的一些感觉你不惜侵犯他人权利 - 008 (20 bytes) 2015-12-08, 19:02:46 (795776)
  - 对了就是要限制他人的一些权利。公共场合禁烟，DUI不都是如此吗。 (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2015-12-08, 19:16:20 (795782)
    - 禁烟是指不能拥有烟吗。现在公共场合可以拿出枪来射着玩吗？ (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2015-12-08, 19:22:05 (795788)
      - 当然不是。但是限制了吸烟者自由吸烟的权利。 - LB (88 bytes) 2015-12-08, 19:39:55 (795796)
        
        法律已经禁止了在公共场合用枪，你现在是要禁“拥” - 008 (106 bytes) 2015-12-08, 20:05:04 (795807)
        
        是管得太宽了，但是没办法，为了避免mass shooting这个代价只能付。 (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2015-12-08, 20:23:09 (795815)
        
        法律限制人的自由和权利的例子多得很，怎么一到枪的问题就那么special? (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2015-12-08, 19:44:50 (795801)
- This applies well to human relations inside a scociety - LB (439 bytes) 2015-12-08, 18:00:23 (795765)
  - There is no freedom of fear - qm (105 bytes) 2015-12-08, 20:18:30 (795813)

加跟贴