Why can't it be both? Where is 不要钱的教授?

送交者: skipper3 于 2006-08-29, 09:31:56:

回答: “长江学者”是个荣誉还是要钱工具？不要钱的教授需要这个计划吗？由 apple 于 2006-08-29, 02:23:15:

or may be you mean those who claim to be intellectuals with good heart and worked very very hard like 16 hours a day and die before they reach 60.

But these people are so mediocre that they are capable of producing nothing valuable. They just waste limited resources, with great due diligence, and in massive scale. But because there are so many of them, none gets blamed.

所有跟贴:

三跳你给算算账，秦国的钱是花到啥猜想上好，还是搞应用科学好？ (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2006-08-29, 10:32:42 (99979)
- On the otehr hand. 应用科学 is problematic - skipper3 (468 bytes) 2006-08-29, 12:44:30 (100001)
- What do I know. I'm not in a position to answer this type - skipper3 (12 bytes) 2006-08-29, 12:32:37 (99999)
- 补充：证明猜想花了钱也没用。而发展工业花钱就管用。中国要造船！ (无内容) - yao (0 bytes) 2006-08-29, 10:47:27 (99982)

加跟贴