很奇怪，Kleiner-Lott也只是发表在网上的preprint啊

送交者: newphd 于 2006-07-26, 07:00:20:

回答: 三镜堂主的业余解说由 eng 于 2006-07-25, 14:09:52:

搞不懂这篇文章为什么说

Oddly, either the book or the Kleiner-Lott paper might count as the "refereed" work the Clay Institute demands

Zhu-Cao的文章应该是满足条件的。

It is easy to understand, corrected - del (843 bytes) 2006-07-26, 09:30:05 (95676)
- 查了一下Clay Institute的大奖要求 - newphd (1813 bytes) 2006-07-26, 11:25:00 (95694)
- 你误解了，我的疑问是Kleiner-Lott paper为什么可以counted as refereed work？ - newphd (495 bytes) 2006-07-26, 11:15:35 (95692)
It is easy to understand - del (766 bytes) 2006-07-26, 09:26:26 (95675)